## Metadata - Author: [[Tim Kimber]] - Full Title: The Four Most Misunderstood Pieces of Writing Advice - Category: #articles - URL: https://medium.com/p/e0604083d331 ## Highlights - Let’s face it: the internet is awash with advice — we are drenched in the expertise of the uncertified, and, when it comes to writing, we are submerged. - “All reading demands an effort. The energy, the good-will [that] a reader brings to the book, is, and must be, partly expended in the labour of reading, marking, learning, inwardly digesting what the author means. The more difficulties, then, we authors obtrude on him by obscure or careless writing, the more we blunt the edge of his attention: so that, if only in our interest — though I had rather keep it on the ground of courtesy — we should study to anticipate his comfort.” - Admittedly, there is merit in this structural edit, but it’s entirely subjective: there are just as many authors with a laser-like focus on the progression of the story as there are who allow the tale to wander (The Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead springs to mind for the latter, with its innumerous backstory chapters for characters whose contribution to the plot has already been spent). - “Whenever you feel an impulse to perpetrate a piece of exceptionally fine writing, obey it — whole-heartedly — and delete it before sending your manuscript to press. Murder your darlings.” - What critics wanted was female characters with agency, independent thought, a rich and textured history, and — just as important as strengths — flaws. Real characters, with relatable feelings and desires, whose goals don’t universally involve winning the heart of a man. - The road to Hell is paved with adverbs,” says Stephen King. (A bit melodramatic, Steve, but I take your point.)